Activists and specialists in the area of intimate partner savagery marked an open letter calling the decision in the Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard trial “damaging.”
On Wednesday, in excess of 140 top organizations and individuals focused on ladies’ privileges and aggressive behavior at home marked an open letter on the side of Heard, 36, against “vilification,” “ongoing online harassment” and “remarkable” hostility. They focused on that the June 1 decision could have “damaging consequences” for other survivors coming forward.
“A lot of this harassment was energized by disinformation, misogyny, biphobia and a monetized social media environment where a woman’s allegations of aggressive behavior at home and sexual assault were taunted for entertainment,” reads the letter. “The same disinformation and casualty blaming figures of speech are presently being utilized against others who have alleged abuse.”
“In our opinion, the Depp v. Heard decision and continued discourse around it indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of intimate partner and sexual viciousness and how survivors respond to it,” they continue. “The damaging consequences of the spread of this misinformation are incalculable.
We have grave concerns about the rising misuse of defamation suits to threaten and quiet survivors.” The letter concludes by condemning “general society shaming of Amber Heard” and adding, “We support the ability of all to report intimate partner and sexual viciousness liberated from harassment and intimidation.”
It was endorsed by Gloria Steinem and Ms. Magazine, Constance Wu, Allen v. Farrow chief Amy Ziering, the National Ladies’ Law Community, The National Organization for Ladies, Ladies’ March Foundation, Ladies’ Equal Equity Undertaking and more. At the profoundly exposed Virginia trial earlier this year, a seven-person jury found that Heard defamed Johnny in her 2018 commentary about abusive behavior at home, however she didn’t mention him by name in the article. He was awarded more than $10 million in damages.
Constance Wu, Gloria Steinem and More Support Amber Heard Against ‘Public Shaming’ in Open Letter – Yahoo Eurosport UK https://t.co/6ixNcatll7 #blockonlineshamers #shaming #bekind
— Stop Cyberbullying (@StopWebBullying) November 16, 2022
Additionally, Heard won one of her defamation counterclaims and was awarded $2 million. They are both appealing the decisions.
A source near Depp tells Individuals, “This was a six-week trial with broad proof, witnesses and key specialists — all which were carefully considered by the jury while reaching their decision, unanimously ruling in Johnny’s favor. This exhausting effort to question the decision months later is an insult to the legal hearers as well as to the equity framework.”
In a statement after the decision, Depp, 59, said the jury “gave me my life back.” He added at the time, “My decision to seek after this case, knowing very well the level of the legal obstacles that I would confront and the inevitable, overall spectacle into my life, was only made after considerable thought
. From the earliest reference point, the goal of bringing this case was to reveal reality, regardless of the result. Speaking the reality of the situation was something that I owed to my youngsters and to all the people who have remained steadfast in their help of me. I feel at peace knowing I have finally accomplished that.”
“I trust that my journey to have the in all honesty will have helped other people, men or ladies, who have wound up in my situation, and that those supporting them won’t ever surrender.
I also trust that the position will presently get back to innocent until demonstrated blameworthy, both within the courts and in the media,” he said.
Heard, meanwhile, said in her post-decision statement that she was “disappointed with what this decision means for other ladies,” calling it a “setback.”
“It impairs the clock to when a woman who shouted out and stood up could be openly shamed and humiliated. It hinders the idea that savagery against ladies is to be taken truly,” said Heard.
“I accept Johnny’s attorneys prevailed with regards to getting the jury to neglect the main point of contention of The right to speak freely of Discourse and overlook proof that was definitive to such an extent that we won in the U.K. I’m sad I lost this case. In any case, I’m sadder still that I appear to have lost a right I assumed I had as an American — to speak unreservedly and straightforwardly.”
Assuming you are experiencing abusive behavior at home, call the National Aggressive behavior at home Hotline at 1-800-799-7233, or go to thehotline.org.
All calls are complementary and confidential. The hotline is available every minute of every day in excess of 170 languages.